The Next Big Thing
In 2001, inventor Dean Kamen announced that his Segway Personal
Transporter would spark a transportation revolution. In 2007, Apple
announced that it had reinvented the phone — and would enchant
consumers — with its new cell phone/music player/Internet device.
Only one of those claims turned out to be right.
Nowhere is it written that a great-sounding concept must beget a
blockbuster product. Three out of four ideas don’t even survive the
development phase, says Bob LaPerle, visiting lecturer of marketing at
Johnson. “And of the products that are launched, one-third fail.”
Products that solve important problems,
or meet previously unmet customer needs, are
five times more likely to succeed than other
new offerings, says LaPerle, a senior marketing
executive whose career — largely at Eastman
Kodak — has focused on new product
development, integrated marketing, global
startups, and turnaround operations. “They
usually gain four times the market share, and
they usually have four times the profitability
of products that are not truly differentiated.”
Figuring out what customers need, and how
to serve those needs in a compelling way, is
the age-old challenge of marketing. For companies
that sell innovative technology, this
challenge is especially tough. After all, a few
years back, how many of us knew we needed
phones that we could use to read magazines
or pay taxi fares?
How do you generate desire for a new
device or capability that no one has heard of?
How do you make sure that a novel technology
product is the kind that customers line
up to buy?
What Comes First
Some successful innovation starts in the lab,
and sometimes it occurs well before a clear
need appears. Fiber optic cable is a case in
point. “Corning invented low-loss optical
fiber in 1970,” points out Phillip Bell, MBA
’07, product line manager, new business
development, at Corning Inc. in Corning,
N.Y. But it took over a decade for the market
to catch up with this new capability.
Only after the U.S. government broke
up the AT&T monopoly in 1984, and new
entrants such as MCI and Sprint started
building new telecommunications infrastructure,
did customers discover a need
for high-performance cable that cost less to
deploy than copper wire. When that demand
emerged, Corning stood ready to deliver.
Innovations in pharmaceuticals and
medical devices sometimes spring from
internal engineering labs at large health
care firms, says Alisa Jirut Craig, MBA ’02,
founder and managing director at BioMedika
Consulting in Glenwood, Md. BioMedika
provides marketing services to companies in
the medical device, biotechnology, and health
care industries.
“They have a group of scientists and
engineers who don’t work at all with the
marketing people or the business side,” says
Craig, who also has worked for several large
health care manufacturers. “They run a think
tank where they develop ideas based on the
company’s technology expertise.” Eventually,
of course, marketing professionals step in to
fine-tune the concepts and determine their
potential with customers.
Starting with a technology breakthrough,
and then finding a need it can fill, does
sometimes produce a successful product, says
LaPerle. “But most of the time, I think it
works better when you have a deep understanding
of unmet needs, problems, and
frustrations among a sizeable target segment,
and then you try to find the technology that
would meet those needs.”
Health care companies take that route,
too. A surgeon, for example, might approach
a manufacturer with ideas about how to make
a stent that is easier to insert or manipulate
through the arteries, says Lori Glick Burke,
MBA ’03, founder and principal of Strategion
Consulting in Pembroke Pines, Fla., which
provides strategy development and marketing consulting services to health care and life
science companies and often collaborates
with BioMedika.
But it often takes an outsider’s eye to spot
a product opportunity. Even when marketers
ask customers directly what they need, the
answers may require translation.
“Sometimes what they say is different from
what they really face,” says Deepak Kallakuri,
MBA ’11, product marketing manager at
Cognex, a Natick, Mass. firm that makes
machine vision systems used in factory
automation. “It’s all about peeling the layers
away to see what their true needs are.”
To illustrate, Kallakuri describes a production
line that moves bottles past a smart
camera system made by Cognex. The camera
checks to make sure that the print on each
bottle’s label is sharp and clear. When it finds
a blurry label, the system displays an alert on
a screen, prompting an employee to change
the cartridge in the printer.
Customers using the Cognex camera for
this and similar purposes had not complained
about the format of the alert. But as he discussed
the process with customers, it dawned
on Kallakuri that employees needed displays
that they could understand at a glance. “I
realized that putting pictures on the screen
instead of text might help,” he says. “When I
brought that point up, customers said, ’Yes,
that makes sense.’”
Job Shadowing
In their earlier careers at large health care
firms, Burke and Craig often headed to the
surgery suite for new product ideas. Each
would spend time watching surgeons and
their staff at work. “After you do that for a
few days, and you really understand it, you
begin to see inefficiencies that surgeons don’t
necessarily notice because they are focused on
the medical procedure and the patient on the
table,” Burke says. “Those inefficiencies are
ripe opportunities for improvement.”
Erin Daly, MBA ’07 (E), product manager
for travel products at Google in Cambridge,
Mass., also favors that sort of job shadowing.
Watching how end users perform their jobs,
she asks numerous questions to understand
why the process runs the way it does.
According to Daly, who also has worked
for several other business application
developers, users tend to concentrate on how
to make incremental improvements. They
rarely consider what would happen if they
changed the process completely. “I’m always
trying to be the voice to challenge the current
functions and ways of doing things,” she says.
Daly says she favors brainstorming with customers
as well, to clarify customers’ objectives
and discover better ways to reach those goals.
At Corning, Bell also spends a great deal
of time probing customers’ needs — for
example, while researching new markets
for a product called Corning Gorilla Glass.
Electronics manufacturers have embraced this
thin, lightweight, damage-resistant material
for uses such as touch-screen displays.
Bell’s challenge is to discover problems that
the Corning product might solve for other
industries.
He takes a different approach for each
target market. When talking to automakers,
for instance, he might focus on upcoming
mandates in Europe and the U.S. to improve
average fuel efficiency.
Since lighter vehicles use less fuel, Bell
talks about reducing weight by replacing
today’s heavier soda lime glass with Gorilla
Glass. “I’ll go to an OEM [original equipment
manufacturer] and say, ’How much
would you pay to have one pound, or one
kilogram, reduced from your car?”
Who Wants This?
Whether a company is seeking new buyers for
existing technology or introducing something
brand new, finding a product idea to solve
a problem is just the start. The company
also must assess the size and quality of the
potential market, to see if the opportunity is
worth pursuing.
In his 1991 book, Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling Disruptive Products to Mainstream Customers. Geoffrey A. Moore first described a predictable sales curve that occurs when a technology company launches something genuinely new.
“When I worked as a product manager,
we typically did this by building a solid
storyboard and presenting the idea to a subset
of prospects to get their feedback,” says
Kishore Bhamidipati, MBA ’05, director of
product marketing at NetSuite, a provider
of cloud-based enterprise resource planning
(ERP) software in San Mateo, Calif.
Several years ago, for example, while
working as senior product manager at
Mercury Interactive (now part of HP),
Bhamidipati helped to develop the idea for
a new tool for software developers. The tool
improves their ability to test applications
before they release the software to users.
Developers must test their applications
under conditions that match the real-world
environment as closely as possible. The software
might work well for five users in the lab,
for instance; but when 2,000 corporate users
try to access the system at once, it crashes.
Few developers, however, can afford to deploy
2,000 workstations for a test.
Mercury proposed a virtual labmanagement
tool. Customers loved the idea,
Bhamidipati says.
Taking input from a ten-customer
advisory board, Mercury refined the concept
and then hit the road to make presentations.
After that came talks about how much
customers would pay for such a tool, based on
the benefits it offered. Eventually, the product
management team presented the business case
to upper management, and a new product
was born.
Even when a product offers a perfect
solution for customers, and even when that
product sells well at the start, another obstacle
stands in the way of real market success. That
obstacle is a chasm — the one that Geoffrey
A. Moore first described in his 1991 book,
Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling
Disruptive Products to Mainstream Customers.
According to Moore, when a technology
company launches something genuinely new,
sales follow a predictable curve. First, a small
number of “innovators” — the technogeeks
— snap up the product. Then, a larger
number of “early adopters” buy in. Members
of this second group don’t love technology for
its own sake, but they’re quick to grasp the
benefits that a novel product provides.
While those early sales make for an
encouraging launch, the product won’t really
take off, Moore says, until large numbers of
mainstream buyers — the “early majority”
and “late majority” — start to step forward.
On the sales curve, the gap between the early
adopters and the early majority is huge. If a
company doesn’t understand how to attract
the early majority, the product’s climb up the
curve could end abruptly at the chasm.
Mainstream buyers expect different
things from technology than innovators
and early adopters, says LaPerle. “If there’s
a buying experience, a service experience or
an educational experience, those experiences
have to be well done and well integrated with the product.” For example, mainstream users
who run into a software problem don’t want
to search online for solutions; they want
quick answers by phone.
Majority buyers also tend to shop in
different distribution channels and respond
to different advertising media than innovators
and early adopters, says LaPerle. “You need a
very focused marketing strategy to cross the
chasm and start attacking the early majority.”
Getting Accross
Strong recommendations from influential
sources may provide a bridge. That’s what
happened for Paul Kaplan, MBA ’87, during
the period when he worked for Motorola.
The company had figured out how to embed
electrically erasable, programmable, read-only
memory (EEPROM) in microcontrollers — a
standard practice today, but a breakthrough
at the time. Although Motorola promoted
potential use cases for the new capability, it
was hard to get the broad customer base to
understand the merits of the technology.
“It wasn’t until we had the first few early
adopters signed on that we really started gaining
traction,” says Kaplan, who now handles
speech and language technologies in the new
business team, Perceptual Computing, at
Intel Corp. in Santa Clara, Calif.
Motorola invited its early adopters to
discuss their intriguing uses for embedded
EEPROM at a seminar for customers
from around the world. “We essentially
bootstrapped the technology into our whole
customer base that way,” Kaplan says.
In a similar manner, physicians who are
early adopters can help to seal the success
of an innovation in health care. “When you
launch a product, you want these doctors to
go to major conferences, talk about it, get it
mentioned in professional journals, and get it
into their practice,” says Craig.
For Bhamidipati at Mercury, the leap
across the chasm started with a focus on a few
early adopters. “I would keep them abreast of
the product development. And when I was
closer to an alpha or beta version, I would
give it to them so they could start testing it
and giving us feedback,” he says.
Eventually, the most interested customers
provided long lists of features that they
wanted to see included. “We’d take that into
consideration, because we wanted them to be
successful and happy with the product,” he
says. In return, Bhamidipati asked those early
adopters to talk up the product in webinars
and panel discussions and discuss its advantages
with analysts and customers. “Getting
them to be successful is the cornerstone of
taking the product to the next level,” he says.
Like Bhamidipati, Daly finds that early
versions of an innovative offering help to
build excitement among key customers. “I’ve
seen that be very successful, having incremental
prototypes on a monthly basis, or every
six weeks, to show them exactly how they
interact with the product,” she says.
In business-to-business marketing, the
key is to give those prototypes not just to
managers, but to the people who will use the
product in their day-to-day work, Daly says.
“If you can win over the end user, then the
adoption just naturally happens.”
Marketing a breakthrough product for
consumers is a little trickier, she says. “You
might be creating a new experience for a
market that doesn’t even exist.”
Matching new technology to customers’
needs is often the easy part of the marketing
equation, says Daly. “My experience has
always been that the challenge is getting
people to embrace the change.” An office
worker who has always used a keyboard and
mouse, for example, might have trouble
understanding the advantages of switching to
a touch screen.
That’s part of the reason prototypes are so
helpful, Daly says. “I think people are instinctively
visual. Showing something working,
and showing how it’s working, makes a big
difference.”
Merrill Douglas writes about a wide range of business and government-related topics for trade magazines, university publications, nonprofits, and corporate clients from her home on a country road in upstate New York.




Excellent Article. To add to Erin Daly's point, getting the innovation out fast to the customer's had is one of the key factors which makes the innovation successful. Often the users "hack" the product to meet their need which was never the intent of the original design. This makes the product mature from 1.x to x.x in continuous improvement cycle.!
I am a big believer in 30-60-90! The idea has to hatch out in 30 days with alpha, become beta in 60 and 1.0 in 90 days!
In this information explosive age 1 week could decide the "success" vs "failure!
Subha Ramiah
MBA'07 (E)
Innovator with a technology heart and business brain in Healcthcare
Post a new comment: